Live AI referee
NYC · 2026

The truth
has a referee
now.

Verdict Debate AI listens to both sides of any argument in real time, flags logical fallacies and false facts the moment they are spoken, and delivers a final judgment. No bias. No memory. Just the truth.

→ Launch
the App
Free · no download · runs right in your browser
Live flags
Straw Man "You want to ban all cars."
False Stat "Crime is up 40% this year."
Verified "The unemployment rate is 4.1%."
Ad Hominem "You would say that."
Slippery Slope "Next they'll ban free speech."
Verified "NASA confirmed this in 2023."
False Dichotomy "You're either with us or against us."
Hasty Generalization "All politicians lie."
Straw Man "You want to ban all cars."
False Stat "Crime is up 40% this year."
Verified "The unemployment rate is 4.1%."
Ad Hominem "You would say that."
Slippery Slope "Next they'll ban free speech."
Verified "NASA confirmed this in 2023."
False Dichotomy "You're either with us or against us."
Hasty Generalization "All politicians lie."
The problem

Misinformation is not a bug.
It is the feature.

65%
of Americans say they regularly encounter misinformation in everyday conversations and on social media.
Pew Research Center, "Misinformation and the 2024 Election," 2024
6x
faster. False news spreads six times more quickly than accurate information on social platforms.
Vosoughi, Roy & Aral, MIT Media Lab / Science, 2018
0
real-time tools exist to referee a live conversation between two people. Until now.
Verdict Debate AI internal analysis, 2026

We live in a time where people argue confidently with facts that are simply wrong. Social media has made it worse. News ecosystems have fractured. And somewhere along the way, the ability to actually hear the other side out became a rare skill.

Most people are not arguing to find the truth. They are arguing to win. Logical fallacies go unchecked because nobody wants to be the one to call it out. Conversations go in circles. Nobody changes their mind.

We built Verdict Debate AI because the best debates are not won by the loudest voice. They are won by the most accurate one. Verdict Debate AI puts truth back at the center of every argument, in real time, with no agenda.

How it works

Four steps.
One verdict.

01

Pick your format

Choose from casual, Public Forum, Lincoln-Douglas, Parliamentary, Policy, or Mock Trial. Each format runs on its actual rules and timing.

02

Set the topic

Pick from a curated preset list or enter your own. Political, social, scientific, or just who was right at dinner.

03

Place and speak

Put the phone between both people. Verdict Debate AI listens through the live mic, transcribes in real time, and flags issues the moment they happen.

04

Get the verdict

Scores update live. When the debate ends, an AI judge delivers a final verdict by points or by argument substance. No appeals.

Verdict Debate AI · Round 2 of 3 · Topic: Universal Basic Income
Debater 1
UBI would give every citizen financial security. Countries like Finland have already proven it works at scale.
Debater 2
That's completely wrong. Finland's experiment was a total failure and they abandoned it after two years. Besides, if you support UBI you basically want to destroy any incentive to work. Straw Man False Claim
!
Two issues flagged. Finland's pilot ran for two years as planned and showed improved wellbeing. Claiming UBI supporters "want to destroy work incentive" misrepresents the position. Debater 2 loses 3 points.
Debater 1
The MIT study from 2023 showed a 12% increase in workforce participation among UBI recipients. Verified
The team

Built in New York.
For everywhere.

JD
Jan Dudaczyk
Co-Founder & CTO

Based in the NYC metropolitan area. Jan has a background in software engineering, AI, and machine learning, and has taught Python, AI, and ML to students at local public libraries. He built Verdict Debate AI because he believes most arguments could be resolved if both sides were actually willing to listen, and saw technology as the only neutral party capable of holding them to that standard.

JB
Jeffrey Begun
Co-Founder & COO

Based in the NYC metropolitan area. Jeffrey has a background in law, public policy, and civic advocacy, and has competed in debate and mock trial at a high level. He currently runs local debate leagues, giving students the tools to argue with precision and integrity. He built Verdict Debate AI to bring that same standard of structured, evidence-based discourse to everyday conversations.

Book a call with Jeffrey
Book a call

Talk to Jeffrey.

Thirty minutes to talk about bringing Verdict Debate AI to your league, classroom, or tournament. Pick a time and he'll confirm by email.

1. Pick a day
2. Pick a time
3. Where should he confirm?
Choose a day and a time to continue.
This opens an email to Jeffrey with your request. He replies to confirm.
Get in touch

Questions? Feedback?
We're an email away.

Verdict Debate AI is live — jump into the app anytime. For press, partnerships, or anything else, reach out directly.

Jan Dudaczyk
jdudaczyk09@gmail.com
Jeffrey Begun
jeffbegun08@gmail.com
Location
New York Metropolitan Area